🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive policy to prohibit social media access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate internationally. Officials, child protection groups, and guardians are monitoring with great interest to see if this strategy will set a precedent for other nations.

Across Europe Momentum

Across Europe, a growing group of countries are considering similar bans.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM stating that mobile devices and networks are "robbing our kids' youth". Legislation could be formalized next year.
• The Norwegian government is set to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to shield the young from the "influence of the algorithms".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to confirm the age and identity of social media participants. The media minister have indicated that an Australian-model ban could be "one of the measures on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the president has urged lawmakers to approve a law increasing the access age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a similar step, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Dutch government has urged parents to block their youngsters from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has passed a non-binding resolution calling for a ban for minors except if guardian approval is provided. Although it warns of the "habit-forming" quality of these platforms, the step does not create mandatory rules.

"A strong age restriction is a solid foundation," said one European lawmaker supporting the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Eye

For the United Kingdom, the government has not ruled out a potential ban, emphasizing that "no measure is discarded" but stressing any decision must be "based on conclusive data".

Previously, momentum gathered behind a bill to impose restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end weakened. Instead, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the topic.

Advocacy groups have raised apprehensions. An organization set up by the family of a teenager who died after being exposed to harmful platform posts contends that a simple age ban may not improve online safety and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of harm when teens reach the legal age.

"This ban is a answer to the inability of the Silicon Valley to design tools that are appropriate and fit for young users," stated a leading online safety campaigner.

The United States: A State-by-State Landscape

Across America, action is largely happening at the local level amid national stalemate.

• Utah mandates guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has signed a measure prohibiting children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation capping minors to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with any further access needing adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted bills demanding guardian approval for minors to set up social media accounts.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from various individuals to copy Australia's path, a federal ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Global Outlook

Apart from these regions, other nations are also considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to ban social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the access age for one major platform to 16.

But, global agencies take a more cautious position. A major UN agency has advised that age-based restrictions carry risks and "might have unintended consequences". The body points out that social networks can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable children and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to invest in user protection.

As this global debate evolves, the actions of Australia and several other countries show that governments around the world are no longer content to delay for tech companies to act voluntarily.