Families' Anguish Regarding Shoreline Erosion Threatening Coastal Norfolk Graves
Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision on how best to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.
A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards
The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.
A recent report on the issue details a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.
“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”
Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.
Troubled by the Past
A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.
“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”
“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”
A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril
Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.
“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”
She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”
Searching for Answers and Certainty
The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.
Several families want more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.
“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”
A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”
He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”
“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the right solutions for each community.”
The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.